WAS THIS FILM BIAS?
We see more of Al Gore's personal life than the actual happenings of global warming in this documentary. For example, the film cuts to parts here and there throughout the movie showing Al's life on the farm as a kid growing tobacco and more prominent: his life as a politician. I really liked this film but I think it had so much more potential to be an even better movie.
I think most of the movie is like a vlog of Al's daily life. It's just the camera following him around with a voice over from him talking about how hard it is to deliver these shows world wide.
There is nothing Al was trying to sell or advertise and I know he does care about the environment but I think he mostly wanted to look like a good politician.
I think most of the movie is like a vlog of Al's daily life. It's just the camera following him around with a voice over from him talking about how hard it is to deliver these shows world wide.
There is nothing Al was trying to sell or advertise and I know he does care about the environment but I think he mostly wanted to look like a good politician.
This picture really pertains to the bias side of things. You can rant all you want to someone who works at a company that cuts down trees, but if he has that job because it puts food on the table at home he's not going to listen to you. He may care about what you have to say but it's against what he makes money for.
"The climate crisis can be solved."